OPINION, (voice Mambesak) --- Dead and the Living is an adjective which states the conditions of an object (humans, animals, plants) is still moving, keep working or dead, lifeless.

Rights of Papuans closer to the word of ownership (noun) or ownership, from Papua human authority.

Dead or Life is Right Papuans, etymology; that determine the life and death of human Papua Papuans themselves (of how to move and work). Although the ratio is dead and life can not be determined by the man himself. Even Papuans also be induvidu could not specify how long he would live and when she would die in any circumstances. What other nation (people) who can determine the life of the nation (the) others. This is wrong.

The sense that is meant not far from economic and political interests. And the real conditions of the annexation atapun integration culminate On the political economy course. Speaking of life and death human context (especially Papua) that is in the earth is in line with the "find" (struggle) eating and drinking. Humans live for eating. The food was obtained from the soil. In fact we also live above ground.

Because the soil is very big role for the living beings on earth. Soil to give life to the plants by providing nutrients and water as well as the support of the root. And the land of life for humans and animals.

And also, people of Papua in general; suppose people Arso, Kerom believe is their ancestral land (such woman). They not only called, but a treasure left by ancestors, saluted by the way-Habits (traditional). They call mama (The language in them) meaning mother. In addition there are the clans of the tribe that comes from the ground. Suppose keret / clan Nawipa (Mee tribe) is merga / keret ground.

Means the land is the mother. Me and some people believe it.

The formation of the human class; bottom, middle and top, and misclassified the poor and the rich is the influence of power. About power struggles find eating and drinking. influenced by economic necessity due to the power system of capitalism that dominates forming a class based on the influence of economic necessity.

Today, not far from our surroundings are. Sodara seen many of us (including SA) experienced poor (economic needs) because they have no land. Whether because sold or taken by the authorities / financiers for the sake of business occupied. Who will enjoy themselves.

Is the destruction of the door. Why?

After that he (the landowner) re-sell their labor at business premises belonging to earlier investors. namely business (struggle) looking for a meal. Because there is no place (product) to obtain food. The impact of living depends on the products and landlords earlier. In addition to selling their labor, their energy drain. Also living children and grandchildren will be even worse.

Context Papua (between Man and Land) First, there is the mother to be losing ground. Additionally, it will customs (custom clothing, ritual tradisinal) will teranam danger. Could become extinct. Anrata human relationships Papua and Nature, the most important thing in the forests of Papua. Forests are above ground.

Then the more time goes on, he will be satisfied with any result merasah (wages) that is given to him. Even if wages do not correspond with the portion, the time, effort worked. In fact he would never ride a class even though the land is hers, and she had already found jatih himself.

He will receive all of it is nature that is mediocre. Is his life had depended to capital owners earlier. hopes that life and death are in his hands. Although mistaken about life and death at the hands of others.

We returned again Taputar to Papua.

Papua is known to shed a wealth of natural resources. But many Papuans live and die on the muddy gold. Bagimana can?

As with the story above. That land (natural resources) in the capture and financiers to make land owned enterprises (employers and government) with the slogan of our lives will they guarantee. Will they provide TV, Money. Promised the kids they sekolahkan land owners will be free. Will they build a house that seater sofa.

This is wrong. Which determines life or death whether it's promises? catchphrase as if the source of life in their hands.

The land was the source of life. Which specify that dead or alive human pemilk own land. Either of gapat work or not. Not the other nations.

So also with the democratic party that worked once every 5 years in Indonesia. The magnificent suit, standing on the stage, closely handheld loudspeaker suarah, flapping hard suarah full lie. Tried hypnosis people with a piece of paper; Rp. 50 thousand rupiah for a tricked the next 5 years.

Promising a matter of life and death for 5 years tomorrow is in the hands of the candidates. This is not a democratic party but a party whore (the candidates) aka party to show off.

The statesman (he) always said that the people of Papua are still not able to live righteously. This language capitalist campaign.

Same thing with Ir. Soekarno upper west region of Papua action claim on the grounds that the Dutch East Indies colony. Had he still Living cap sa language that is not logical. Because even though the same occupiers, this land belonged to the Papuans. Different from earth ground and also the Dutch East Indies.

It lustfully treasure earlier, it was proved by the statement Murtopo in 1966 that, "that Indonesia did not want people of Papua, Indonesia just want the land and natural resources contained in the island of Papua. If Papuans want independence, please find another island in the Pacific for free. Or ask the Americans to provide a place for people in Papua occupies there, "Sofyan Yoman Socratez in his book" Ethnicity Annihilation Melanesia, 2007 published by Galang Press.

Especially this time again it hot Military tai chicken on earth mengekspedisi Papua. Tasks and military basic attitude is doing expeditions? It really was the truth. Between the needs of people of Papua today and this military expedition was disconnected. Keliruh which is the military, on top of statesmen (landlords).

More wrong again about the Papuans want self-determination, but it is forbidden by the Homeland. They are part of the Homeland Papua cap with the slogan One nation, one language. The ratio NKRI has many islands inhabited by every nation and tribes of different language, culture, and taste. Wrong who?

Similarly Luhut said, Menkopolhukam, not long ago. "Yes, they just go to MSG there, do not stay in Indonesia again." The speech was not much different with the words Murtopo above.

Papua NKRI and or live alone, will not be spared from the dead and living. Depending on the work and force Papuans themselves.

But everyone Papua should be killed when talking about the rights of their lives. For adala ruler against the unity of the country. Then the state through the military and police had to kill Papuans, raped the women of Papua, and capture and memenjarahkan fighters Papuans the right to life.

Mute democratic space, bagun racist ideology among human creation, stikma separatist plots to justify Jen talks. Rather Murtopo earlier.

It keliruh. Just a wild animal that could take the life of another living creature to feed. A matter of life and death is determined by each of the Papuans themselves, human beings in general. Not the unity of the country. Aspiration of course, never in reply regards realization. What's more a matter of life and death of a everyone.

Right then Nasip determination itself is logical. Namely the determination of the dead and the life of the Papuans themselves. (Jhe / KM)

The author is a study in Java, students from Papua.